Covering three:
The Avengers
I didn't bother blogging this one when it came out, because it was just too obvious. I simply can not imagine a better super hero movie, unless Avengers 2 is just two hours of Black Widow making out with Pepper Potts. If you haven't seen the Avengers yet, you owe me $5 stupidity tax. By the way, I've seen it with and without 3D, and it was beautiful both ways. The 3D is great but not required, so use your own judgement there.
Amazing Spider-Man
This was fun, but I liked the other trilogy better. And that's really the hardest part of sitting through Amazing Spider-Man - the fact that I'd seen most of it before. Generally I don't mind remakes or reboots, in truth I think it's fun seeing how different people tackle the same story. But in this case I wish they'd just summed up his origin story in the opening credits. Instead, this movie actually spends more time on his origin story than the 2002 version. We all know Spidey's origin, and while I appreciate the differences (the return of web shooters, intrigue involving his parents, Uncle Ben's accident playing out differently), they didn't need to draw it out so long.
Andrew Garfield does a decent enough job, but it really got on my nerves the way he always took so long to speak. "How are you, Peter?" "................................Fine." They could have shaved 15 minutes off the movie's running time if they'd removed all the awkward conversational pauses. You could tell a lot of the dialogue between Peter and Gwen was meant to be cutesy and clever, but it fell flat on my ears. Maybe I'm just too old.
I loved the Lizard. He looked great, and the fight scenes were a lot of fun, even if they did look a bit like video game cutscenes. The part of the movie's climax involving cranes - you'll know it when you see it - was so cheesy that I can't decide whether I love it or hate it. It was reminiscent of the "don't threaten New Yorkers" bridge scene in the 2002 movie, only much more over the top.
Overall I'd have to give it a thumbs up, but understand it really doesn't do much that wasn't done ten years ago. I try not to judge movies based on other movies, but the bottom line is that if the earlier trilogy didn't exist, I would have been much more impressed by Amazing Spider-Man.
By the way, we saw it in 3D, which was fine, but they really didn't do much with it. Save a couple of bucks and see it in 2D instead; you won't miss much IMO.
The Dark Knight Rises
It was really hard for me to get interested in seeing DKR. Sure, Batman Begins was a great way to cast away old shames and restart the franchise. And The Dark Knight was as good as a Batman movie could ever hope to be. But none of the trailers for Dark Knight Rises really pulled me in. After the flashy, colorful Avengers movie, I wasn't sure if I really wanted to see another gritty, realistic Batman.
But I loved every minute of it. And I do mean every minute, which kind of blows my mind. The movie is nearly three hours long, and I'd heard that it lags in the middle, but I never felt bored. There were a couple of subplots that could have been left out without affecting the movie's overall quality, but nothing that really bogged the movie down.
Bane was great. I wasn't expecting much out of him, but he really captured the spirit of the comic book character. But predictably, the character I liked most was Selina Kyle. She was clever and funny... yeah, there wasn't much there that we hadn't already seen from Black Widow, but I'd rather see it from Selina.
The movie seemed to pick bits of its plot out of several comic story arcs, such as No Man's Land, Son of the Demon, and of course Knightfall. It's as if Christopher Nolan scoured the history of the Batman universe to find the bits that would be most believable. In some ways it felt like a direct sequel to Batman Begins, with Dark Knight just being an interesting extra story thrown in the middle. It ended perfectly, wrapping up all the right details and really capping off the trilogy well.
Awesome as it was, I am glad this is the last one. It's a great trilogy, but it doesn't need more. I hope the next Batman reboot is more on par with the 1989 movie. The Nolanverse is awesome, but I'm ready for something a little more comic-booky again. Not silly like Batman & Robin, but just fanciful enough that it could exist in the same universe as the Justice League. I'm tired of Marvel having all the fun.
By the way, DKR also shows the new teaser for Man of Steel. I don't think I've ever seen a more pointless trailer full of random images. I'll withhold judgement on the movie itself, as a lot of great movies have rotten early teasers. But seriously, who thought this teaser was a good idea?
1 comment:
Personally I found a lot of goodness in the new Spidey, but then I had no expectations whatsoever.
This new Peter is more of a hipster brat rather than the apple-pie-suburbs-little-gentleman we're used to, but it's a nice catch-up with the times.
I found the fights with the lizard a lot more true-to-source this time around with the Spidey banter here and there ("Don't... make... me... hurt you!").
I also found it a nice touch that the director was careful of using nearly all the poses Spidey used in its most famous covers.
However... I still have the sneaking suspicion that this movie came out of one of pre-year-2000 rejected scripts: The unnecessary gadgets even at Pete's door, the story around gene therapy, those are trends from 2000.
It's been a while since we have a year like this, keeping us waiting for the next great geek movie: Avengers, Spider-Man, Dark Knight Rises, Prometheus.
Israel Reyes
GAMES PEOPLE PLAY: A webcomic about roleplaying games and the people who play them.
Post a Comment