So in my last blog I finally caught up on the Predator movies I'd missed. I thought I was completely up-to-date on the theatrical Alien and Predator movies, but I realized I was still missing one thing.
Okay, so you know by now I hate Alien 3. In fact, you're probably sick of hearing about it. If so, skip this blog entry. I will be covering a lot of the same ground.
I dislike the movie for several reasons, but the biggest is the way it screws up its predecessor's ending. I believe Ripley and Newt earned their happy ending. My fondest wish for the franchise is a new movie that reveals Alien 3 and Resurrection were just nightmares Ripley had in hypersleep, and the new film could follow the adventures of an adult Newt.
Alien 3 has some plot holes right from the start, such as how/when did the queen xenomorph lay at least two eggs (without her egg sack, mind you) somewhere on the Sulaco? How did a facehugger get into Ripley's cryo tube and impregnate her without interrupting her cryosleep? The timing just doesn't work, and it feels like we're just supposed to accept it because "that's the plot of the film, deal with it."
Plus it sets up problems it doesn't fix. I've mentioned this in previous blogs, but I like happy endings. The job of a writer is to come up with a problem, then fix it. From the moment Ripley learns she's been impregnated, she's a walking corpse. The audience is supposed to wonder "how is she going to get out of this one?" And then it's the writer's job to come up with a solution we weren't expecting. Problem: Ripley's going to die. Solution: Ripley dies. Wow, that's sooooooo creative, writing team. I hope you all got raises.
Overall it just doesn't do anything interesting or new with the series. The first movie had one alien, the second escalated the conflict to an alien army, and Alien 3 is just the first movie all over again, but not as good.
But putting all my prejudices aside, is Alien 3 a good film? If you have no prior expectations from the Alien universe, is it a satisfying cinematic experience? Does it stand on its own as a solid film?
In my opinion, no. Not at all. It's dull, it's boring, the action is chaotic, the dialogue is bad, the sound quality sucks, and I don't care about the characters. It can't even pick a genre: It's not scary enough to be horror, and it doesn't have enough action to be an action movie.
Back when it was released in 1992, most people seemed to agree with my assessment. But in the years since, the new generation has been much kinder. I think there's a tendency for people to enjoy things more if they've always existed from their point of view.
It's like the Star Wars prequels. The people who grew up on the original trilogy found the prequels to be disappointing, but the kids who grew up with all six movies seem to love them. Same with Alien: To the new generation, there have always been at least four Alien movies, so they don't have the disappointment of waiting years for a sequel only to be let down.
It's the difference between what might have been, versus what's always been. When a new movie is announced, our imaginations are ignited. What's it going to be about? Do the marines find an alien homeworld and take the fight to them? Do the aliens make it to Earth? So many cool ideas. So when the actual sequel just rehashes the first movie's plot, it's a big letdown.
A couple of years before Alien 3, a company called Dark Horse released a series of Alien comics that explored a lot of cool ideas, some of which would have made for great cinema. Some of the comics even featured the survivors of the second movie in new adventures. But Alien 3 made those stories obsolete. I know comics are rarely considered canon, but I'd rather believe in those superior stories to the one presented by Alien 3.
One cool thing the early comics revealed is that xenomorph queens aren't born queens. They're like bees, in that the other aliens feed it royal jelly so that it grows into a queen. I like this explanation a lot more than Alien 3's "Ripley just happens to be impregnated with a queen."
I've heard some defend Alien 3 by saying it's the movie that established how horrific this world is: That there is no hope for you if you exist in the Alien universe. Personally I don't think that's a thing that needed to be established, but some people are into dismal universes.
Even the director, David Fincher, hates the film. He didn't have enough creative control over the theatrical cut, and the final product didn't match his vision. Enter... the Assembly Cut. Also referred to as the Special Edition (well, it's more complicated than that, but I'll spare you), this director's cut was released in 2003, and more accurately depicts Fincher's original plan.
For years I heard that it's a much better film. It's beloved by many of the people who hated Alien 3's theatrical cut. So as much as I was loathe to load up that movie again, I decided I had to give it a chance. I knew it still kills off the survivors of Aliens, but I had to get past that and judge the movie on its own merits. It was finally time to give this movie the chance it deserved.
So... did I like it?
Well... it is a much better film. The editing is more cohesive. The characters have more depth, and are no longer just interchangeable bald guys. The extra footage does add to the story. The sound quality is a lot better. Now that I can actually hear the dialogue, the plot even makes more sense. Other than my prejudices about the deaths, it's actually... not too bad.
It still has flaws. While the practical effects on the xeno's close-ups are some of the best in the series, the CGI long shots are downright cartoonish. I mean, "takes me right out of the film" goofy. There's more and more of these shots toward the end of the film, and those shots made me laugh out loud in scenes that were supposed to be filled with tension. Seriously, they could have edited in the sprites from the SNES game and it would have looked better.
With most of the characters being violent criminals, it's hard to really care when they get killed. At no point was I emotionally invested in anyone but Ripley. It actually has a decent cast, and most of them do a great job, but I just didn't care whenever they died. I wish there could have been more than one female character in the movie, but that wouldn't have worked with the plot.
The bottom line is, the Assembly Cut is a much better cut of the film. It almost feels like a real movie instead of a rushed cash grab. The Assembly Cut is a lot like Highlander 2's Renegade Version. It polishes a turd until it's almost pleasant to look at.
But we didn't make a Love Connection today. My prejudices still stand - they shouldn't have undone the previous movie, and it still doesn't do anything creative with the franchise. This is definitely the cut to watch if you want to see it, but for me, the timeline ends after Aliens.
Note that there's also alternate cuts of Alien, Aliens, and Resurrection. The only one I've yet to see is Resurrection, but I'm told it's not that dramatic a difference (except for the ending). If I ever watch Resurrection again, I'll be sure to watch the alternate cut for completeness sake.
Here's my updated version of my ranking of the Alien/Predator movies, with alternate cuts included.
1a. Aliens (1986) Special Edition
1b. Aliens (1986)
2a. Alien (1979)
2b. Alien (1979) Director's Cut
3. Prey (2022)
4. Alien: Romulus (2024)
5. Predators (2010)
6. Predator (1987)
7. Predator 2 (1990)
8. Alien vs. Predator (2004)
9. Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (2007)
10. Alien Resurrection (1997)
11. Prometheus (2012)
12. Alien: Covenant (2017)
13. The Predator (2018)
14a. Alien 3: Assembly Cut (2003)
14b. Alien 3 (1992)